challenge
The scale has five, seven-point items that measure how much a person believes there are hardships he/she must overcome that were bought on by an unspecified “external force.”
With ten, seven-point items, the scale measures how much a person is absorbed in an activity because it is the optimal challenge for his/her skill.
The level of knowledge and personal experience a person reports having with dieting is measured in this scale using ten items with a seven-point response format.
Using six, seven-point uni-polar items, the scale measures the extent to which a person reports feeling attacked verbally in the sense of his/her image being maligned.
The level of effort and time required to complete a specified task is measured in this scale using three, seven-point semantic differentials.
With three, seven-point unipolar items, this scale measures how challenging a task or process is considered to be.
Three, seven-point semantic-differentials are used to measure how complicated a person believes a certain good or service to be, especially as it pertains to its usage.
This six-item, seven-point Likert-type scale measures the degree to which a person who has just had an extraordinary experience views it as being personally challenging and instructive.
This four-item, six-point Likert-type scale is supposed to measure the degree to which a person feels he/she has been challenged but prevailed in a situation.
Four, seven-point Likert-type statements are used to measure a person's attitude regarding the extent to which an Internet-usage task has challenged his/her abilities. The scale was called navigational challenge by Mathwick and Rigdon (2004).